|
Euro
Cookies leave nasty taste in the mouth
Amanda
Chandler, (European Director of Data Protection) of DoubleClick and a council member
of eMMa, tells Wired Up how new European laws on cookies
will affect internet marketers, advertisers and publishers.
Europes
telecom ministers are at it again. The European Commission is currently passing
through layers of bureaucracy in Brussels with its Communications Data Protection Directive.
And
as every Sun reader knows, the Brussels bureaucrats would
dictate the size of our sausages if they could get away with
it! So it is probably unsurprising that there are many rulings
afoot that will dramatically affect how marketing is conducted
online.
One
such ruling could force companies to warn consumers every
time a cookie is being issued and allow individuals to reject
them. Unsurprisingly the move has provoked consternation from
the online business community. Wired Up investigates
Wired
Up: Which is the better option opt-in or opt-out cookies?
Amanda Chandler: Opt-out. Because, although cookies provide
virtually zero security risk to consumers, if people feel
nervous about them they can choose not to have
them around.
Opt-in
cookies require surfers to positively accept cookies each
time they visit a new site. But managing cookies in this way
is technically difficult and expensive. Because internet visitors
enter websites through any number of pages, not just the home
pages front door, under this regime every
page would need to be set up to screen new visitors. Added
to which search engines or web directories such as Yahoo are
connected to millions of third-party sites. So, every time
a visitor enters a new site indirectly they would be put in
the ludicrous position of having to accept up to eight different
cookies.
Wired
Up: Who would be the main losers if the directive goes through
as is?
AC: The directive would be a lose-lose situation for everyone.
For a start not every firm will be able to afford the extra
technology, particularly at a time when budgetary belts are
being winched tight. The resulting extra demand on costs will
be passed on to advertisers and so encourage them to spend
their budgets elsewhere.
For
consumers, visiting an opt-in cookie web site will become
a slower, clunkier and more expensive operation requiring
them to accept cookies each time they enter a new website,
or a previously-visited site via a new machine.
But
with opt-out cookies a website can be configured to enhance
the surfers experience online. The new directive would
affect advertisers ability to do this.
Wired-Up:
Why do the Eurocrats seem bent on pushing the legislation
through?
AC: The European Commission does mean well, but there is a
sense of it assuming that Europeans are asking to be
protected, which is a bit patronising to consumers.
What is most irritating is the ongoing misunderstanding about
what cookies are and how companies use the technology. As
they stand cookies provide very low security risk and legislation
already exists to protect the consumer from personal abuse
through them.
Wired-Up:
Is all lost then will the directive be passed as it
now stands?
AC: The debate will not
be over until the directive is finalised in April, and it
is very difficult to know where it will all end up.
As
it stands, consumers will ultimately be the biggest losers
in the long-term. Using the internet will be sluggish and
phone bills will be higher as consumers spend longer downloading
web pages. Web publishers will also see advertising revenue
decrease as the resulting price hikes drive advertisers elsewhere.
|